Ergebnisse zu Ihrer Suche: ewzYr9iN0' OR 712=(SELECT 712 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

Typically, licensed trainings are interactive workshops with “training from the back of the room“. Trainings without licensed trainers (i.e. without a CST of Scrum Alliance or a PST of Scrum.org) are not subject to any quality control. Often the trainers do not have several years of practical experience.

But we don’t see much drive from the CEOs or CTOs, do we? Malte: I am not sure if that is true because we, wibas, are typically called from the executive suite. So there are two levels of the organizations who really want to change things. And I believe that the top executive suite is not only calling because they want to earn more money but they really care about the structure.

Quellen: Kniberg, Henrik (2011): Lean from the Trenches. Managing Large-Scale Projects with Kanban. The Pragmatic Programmers. Texas (USA).

These could be simple texts, bullets or hypotheses to explore. If the User Story Format is not defined in the Scrum Guide, where does it come from? Origin of the User Story Format The User Story format comes from Extreme Programming, also known as XP. Kent Beck invented it and uses stories (he didn’t call them “user stories”) to describe a user’s real stories. What exactly does Kent mean by that?

Scaled Agile proposes the Lean-Agile Center of Excellence, or LACE. It is, in a sense, the string around the whole SAFe implementation!Such high-profile members have many responsibilities, of course, so they can only participate in a LACE 20% or 50% or so of their time.

Existing Scrum or Scrumban teams can benefit from Kanban. A customer report outside of IT shows how individual aspects of Kanban improve a messy situation. Recently at the customer “We’re doing Scrumban.” Of course, it’s not running optimally, otherwise I wouldn’t be here as a coach.What of Scrum do I find here? The roles of Scrum Master and Product Owner are filled in the controller team.

I know that they arise from a different perspective that does not match my own, and that I may not know or have dealt with it before. An open-minded approach and a focus on the perspectives of others can help overcome resistance and successfully implement change processes. Conclusion Overall, constructivism offers a valuable perspective on the change process.

Why we decouple size from effort: At any given moment, size is related to duration and effort. The factor in this relationship is the current Velocity (or Throughput). The Velocity of a team changes as the team improves or as we introduce techniques like test automation. As the Velocity changes, the duration and effort change. While size tends to be stable, Velocity tends to change.

In concrete terms: How can we achieve the same solutions or visions with fewer rules and fewer roles? And not unimportant: What can we offer alternatively to people who need rules and roles? To the first question: How can we achieve the same solutions or visions with fewer rules?

Yet SAFe is far from being complete. And SAFe really, really is not the single source of truth. When Program Increments are not the right choice: Select LeSS-like Sprints. The unfix pattern of flexible team composition fits to your organization? Why wouldn´t you choose it, if it seems to be the best option for your current situation?